Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
For decades, the analysis of parliaments in parliamentary democracies focused on political parties (assumed to behave as unitary actors) and neglected any investigation of the behaviour and motivations of individual parliamentarians. As a consequence, we know very little, theoretically or empirically, about the goals and motivations of parliamentarians in Europe. The workshop aims to overcome this deficit by exploring the behaviour, interests and incentives of individual parliamentarians in various European parliaments. First, we aim to systematically map individualized behaviour in European parliaments across parliamentary activities, countries, and time. Second, we aim to take first steps towards theoretical and empirical explanations of the causes of individualization. Third, we aim to explore the consequences of individualization for our understanding of the role political parties and individual MPs in making representative democracy work. Given this, the workshop will focus on the following empirical and theoretical questions: (1) What does the institutional incentive and opportunity structure for individualized behaviour (as determined for example by factors like parliamentary rules, electoral rules, promotional prospects, and individual resources) look like across countries and time? (2) To what extent do we observe individualized behaviour in European parliaments and how does this sort of behaviour vary across countries, time, and activities (for example in terms of voting, initiatives, speeches, questions, campaigning, communication with voters…)? (3) Can institutional incentives and opportunity structures [our first question] explain observed behaviour [our second question]? (4) What are the consequences of individualized behaviour for parliamentary processes, parliamentary outcomes, the role of political parties, and ultimately our understanding of representative parliamentary democracy?
| Title | Details |
|---|---|
| MPs as Slack Maximizers | View Paper Details |
| Aiming Higher: The Consequences of Progressive Ambition among European MPs | View Paper Details |
| Individual Parliamentarians’ Preferences and the Design of Parliamentary Publicity in Western Europe | View Paper Details |
| Electoral Systems, Candidate Selection Methods and their Interaction: A Two-Dimensional Approach to Understanding Parliamentarians | View Paper Details |
| Parliamentary Speech during the Soverign Debt Crisis | View Paper Details |
| Policy, Office and Votes: The Electoral Value of Megaseats | View Paper Details |
| Agenda Control and Coalition Unity in Parliamentary Democracies | View Paper Details |
| Cooperation Strategies MPs use both in Initiating Bills and Co-sponsoring them | View Paper Details |
| Personalised Campaigning and Constituency Service Questions Under Mixed Electoral Rules | View Paper Details |
| Explaining Legislative Dissent in a Parliamentary Democracy: Sweden 1994 to 2012 | View Paper Details |
| Electoral Institutions and Issue Uptake in the Legislative Arena | View Paper Details |
| Parliamentary Careers and their Influence on Legislative Behaviour | View Paper Details |
| Individualisation of MPs Behaviour: More than Campaign Talk? | View Paper Details |
| Personalised Parliamentary Behaviour without Electoral Incentives: The case of the Netherlands | View Paper Details |
| Marriages or Flirts? Explaining the Duration of Party Affiliation in the Italian Parliament 1996-2011 | View Paper Details |
| Strategy, Socialisation, or Both? Minority-Ethnic MPs and the Substantive Representation of Minority Interests in the House of Commons, 2005-2013 | View Paper Details |
| Party of One? The Independent MP in Westminster Democracy | View Paper Details |
| The Cohesion of Political Party Groups and Individualised Behaviour in Parliament | View Paper Details |
| Beyond Party Unity: MPs’ Personal Traits and Legislative Behavior on Moral Policy Issues | View Paper Details |
| Roll Call Votes as Currency of Individual Accountability | View Paper Details |