ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

The Politics of Vaccine Hesitancy in Europe

Comparative Politics
Political Ideology
Public Opinion
Survey Research
Florian Stoeckel
University of Exeter
Jason Reifler
University of Exeter
Florian Stoeckel
University of Exeter

To access full paper downloads, participants are encouraged to install the official Event App, available on the App Store.


Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy threatens public health. Some evidence suggests vaccine hesitancy in Europe may be linked with the success of populist parties, but more systematic analysis is needed. We examine the prevalence of individual level vaccine hesitancy across the EU and its association with political orientations. We also analyse whether success of populist parties is linked with vaccine hesitancy and uptake. We draw on individual-level Eurobarometer data from 2019, with a total of 27,524 respondents across the EU. We also rely on national and regional level populist party vote shares. Finally, for a time-series analysis, we rely on aggregated populist party support as measured in the European Social Survey waves 1-9 (2002 to 2018), and national immunization coverage rates from the WHO from 2004-2018. While vaccine hesitancy is confined to a minority of the population, this group is large enough to risk herd immunity. Political orientations on a left-right dimension are not strongly linked to vaccine hesitancy. Instead, vaccine hesitancy is associated with anti-elite world views and culturally closed rather than cosmopolitan positions. Although success of populist parties is a poor predictor of vaccine uptake, the link between vaccine misperception and hesitancy is stronger in countries where populist parties do well. Vaccine hesitancy is not only present in all EU member states, but also maps on broader dimensions of cultural conflict. Hesitancy is rooted in a broader worldview, rather than misperceptions about health risks. Provaccine interventions need to consider the underling worldview, rather than simply targeting misperceptions.