Install the app
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Menu
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: (Building B) Faculty of Law, Administration & Economics , Floor: 4th floor, Room: 402
Thursday 15:50 - 17:30 CEST (05/09/2019)
Although these decisions can often seem narrowly technical, recent years have shown how judges can shape outcomes in areas as disparate as taxation, welfare, and asylum. This panel provides an opportunity for scholars to link detailed court decisions to broad "political" factors. The papers of this panel use innovative qualitative or quantitative methods to study the problems that are peculiar to courts, particularly insofar as they relate to legal language, symbolism, and voting decisions.
| Title | Details |
|---|---|
| Referral-Free Behaviour of National Judges: What Motivates the Use of EU Law Outside of the Preliminary Ruling Procedure? | View Paper Details |
| Beyond Footnotes: Comparing Case-Based Reasoning at The European Court of Human Rights and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia | View Paper Details |
| Judicial Positions on Political Reform: Designing Common Policy Scores from Judicial Text | View Paper Details |
| Institutional Reform and Judicial Behaviour in the European Court of Human Rights | View Paper Details |