ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Beyond the Coup D’état: Military Roles in Democratic Backsliding Since the Cold War

Comparative Politics
Conflict
Democracy
Democratisation
Elites
Security
Mixed Methods
Political Regime
Aurel Croissant
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Aurel Croissant
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
David Kuehn
German Institute for Global And Area Studies

To access full paper downloads, participants are encouraged to install the official Event App, available on the App Store.


Abstract

This paper presents first descriptive insights from a new research project on military roles in democratic backsliding since the end of the Cold War. Conceptualizing military roles as either perpetrators, accomplices, bystanders, or custodians, and drawing on a new, original dataset the paper documents their empirical prevalence across all episodes of democratic backsliding in electoral democracies from 1991 to 2025. The paper examines three interrelated dimensions of military behavior during democratic backsliding. First, it analyzes how military roles vary across different modes of backsliding and regime types, with particular attention to differences between incumbent-led erosion and breakdown episodes and to institutional contexts such as presidential systems and legacies of civilian control. Second, it explores regional patterns in military roles, identifying clusters of persistent military passivity as well as regions marked by more frequent active involvement in backsliding processes. Third, the paper investigates descriptive associations between military roles and the outcomes of backsliding episodes, comparing patterns of democratic erosion, breakdown, and re-equilibration across different forms of military behavior. By offering the first comprehensive assessment of military behavior in all post-Cold War episodes of democratic backsliding, the paper challenges prevailing assumptions about the military’s declining relevance and lays the groundwork for future explanatory and causal analyses