ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Populist Radical Right Parties in Action. The Survival of the Mass Party

Populism
Party Members
Political Activism
Stijn van Kessel
Queen Mary, University of London
Stijn van Kessel
Queen Mary, University of London
Daniele Albertazzi
University of Surrey
Stijn van Kessel
Queen Mary, University of London
Adrian Favero
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Niko Hatakka
University of Birmingham
Judith Sijstermans
University of Birmingham
Mattia Zulianello
University of Trieste

To access full paper downloads, participants are encouraged to install the official Event App, available on the App Store.


Abstract

Based on a forthcoming book with the same title, this contribution investigates why and how several contemporary populist radical right parties (PRRPs) in Western Europe adopt the supposedly outdated mass party organizational model. While the first half of the twentieth century saw the rise of political organizations characterized by clearly identifiable ideologies rooted in local communities, the so-called mass parties, this organizational model is now widely assumed to belong to the past. Citizens are seen to disengage from party politics, and in an age of mass and new social media, old as well as new parties can reach out to the electorate without the need for extensive face-to-face interaction. However, the mass party model has proven to be resilient, and indeed successful among several PRRPs, which criticize established parties precisely for having lost touch with ordinary citizens. Through an analysis of party structures and interviews with 125 PRRP elites and 100 active members, the study opens the black box of four populist radical right mass party organizations in Belgium, Finland, Italy, and Switzerland. It finds that party elites consider the mass party model advantageous to their party’s electoral goals, organizational functioning, and survival. In addition, the study shows how a collective sense of efficacy is key in keeping activist members motivated to invest time and effort in party activities, despite experiencing stigmatization and receiving few concrete benefits in return. Based on its findings, the authors re-evaluate traditional wisdoms of party organization theory, and show how traditional forms of party organization adapt to changing political contexts and communication environments.