ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

(Gender) Identity as Problem and Solution: Theoretical Perspectives and Implications for Civic Education

Citizenship
Identity
Education
Elia Scaramuzza
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Elia Scaramuzza
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz

Abstract

Identity refers to individual as well as (seemingly) collective identities. From a critical theoretical perspective, identity can be both problem and solution, functioning as restrictive attribution and foundation for self-consciousness and empowerment (Mende/Müller 2016: 8). From the 1960s until the present, the construction of individual and collective gendered, especially female identities have been discussed respectively: Is a (shared) gender identity necessary for a critique of and political action against sexism or is it instead used to disguise inter- and intrapersonal differences and contradictions in favor of unity, consistency and standardization (Butler 1990/2008; Becker-Schmidt 2016)? Hence, there lies „disagreement [...] in whether identity should be developed, multiplied, deconstructed or abolished.“ (Mende/Müller 2016: 7, my translation). Against this backdrop, civic education is challenged to address identity in a reflexive manner. While binary approaches are possible, they tend to persist in a either-or-dichotomy that is unable to grasp the interdependence of both solution- and problem-oriented perspectives. In contrast, a non-binary reflexive approach is able to discuss the patterns of justification and implications for both social relations and subject constitution with regards to their potential for liberation and a critique of social domination (Müller 2019). Drawing from the examples of diverse gender, particularly trans* identities, the paper discusses identity neither as problem or solution but as both solution and problem. A discussion of theoretical perspectives is followed by implications for civic education: If identity is neither to be idealized nor dismissed, what could an identity reflexive civic education look like with regards to its conditions, basic principles, content, methods and interactions? Literature: Becker-Schmidt, Regina (2016): Einerlei statt Allerlei. Identitätslogische Konstruktionen in gesellschaftlichen Rationalisierungsprozessen und Identitätszwänge in Geschlechterordnungen. In: Müller, Stefan/Mende, Janne (Eds.): Differenz und Identität. Konstellationen der Kritik. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa, 181-201. Butler, Judith (1990/2008): Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge. Müller, Stefan (2019): Beyond a Binary Approach: Contradictions and Strict Antinomies. In: Lossau, Julia/ Schmidt-Brücken, Daniel/Warnke, Ingo H. (Eds.): Spaces of Dissension. Contradiction Studies. Springer VS: Wiesbaden. Müller, Stefan/Mende, Janne (2016): Weder getrennt noch eins. Identität, Differenz und die Frage der Freiheit. In: Müller, Stefan/Mende, Janne (Eds.): Differenz und Identität. Konstellationen der Kritik. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa, 7-28.