ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Europeanisation and Global Academic Capitalism: The Case of the European Research Council

European Union
Globalisation
Knowledge
Higher Education
Vincent Gengnagel
Zeppelin University Friedrichshafen
Vincent Gengnagel
Zeppelin University Friedrichshafen
Stephanie Beyer
Zeppelin University Friedrichshafen
Richard Münch
Zeppelin University Friedrichshafen

Abstract

The EU wants the “European Research Area” to become an academic frame of reference in its own right, aiming for a competitive dynamic between national academic traditions and the global hegemony of US research. At first glance, such an attempt at a Europeanisation of academia seems to be vertically posited by the EU Research Framework Programmes, and is of little appeal to certain strategies of academic self-promotion in the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), which prefer to portray themselves as independent from such political projects. Historically, they have established fine-tuned but precarious relations to their respective national-cultural fields. Recently, however, the European Research Council (ERC) succeeded in establishing a genuinely academic logic that relates to strategies of scientific autonomy: By adhering to the meritocratic rules of academic legitimacy the ERC created a kind of competition that (at least in ambition) spans across all of Europe. In doing so, for the first time both the governance-oriented and the critical or humanist idealist elites can actively relate to the ERC as a European institution able to consecrate academic excellence. As a consequence, they contribute to the discursive construction of a European order characterized by a symbolic and material integration of elites, the opening up of national fields and the primacy of economic competition. The presentation additionally draws on results of a structural topic model of all ERC grant research summaries in the SSH 2007-12 and tries to embed the results in the larger picture of a political sociology of fields of cultural production.