This paper examines the relationship between electoral rules and the chain of delegation from voters to political decision makers. I argue that whether electoral rules push voters to focus primarily on individual candidates or to cast their votes for parties not only structures voter-candidate relations, but also relationships between successful candidates and party leaders and party positions about redistributive policy. Candidate-centered rules motivate candidates to target the benefits of policy to their own constituents. Party-centered electoral rules provide no such incentive, but rather make it more attractive to design policy to benefit larger constituencies more broadly. Consequently, parties on the right and left (but particularly on the right) should have more redistribution-heavy platforms in party-centered systems than in candidate-centered ones. I test the implications of my argument using party-position data from the Comparative Manifesto Project.
