The concept of an agro-production park combines industrial with environmental and animal friendly agriculture. In the Netherlands, academics and government introduced this idea: what we consider a boundary concept - to align economic and environmental ambitions. We argue that boundary concepts are important in deliberations as they create a sphere of engagement that enables participants to scrutinize their routines, and to explore new interpretations and practices that replace their normal ways. In this way we ground the notion of “reflexive governance” in deliberative practices for sustainable agriculture. We explored if and how the concept of an agropark induced frame-reflective conversations about conflicting and overlapping interpretations. We conducted a frame analysis of four Dutch national newspapers and analyzed ten deliberative sessions about agroparks to study if reflectivity occurred. Our findings suggest that the introduction of innovative boundary crossing concepts invites participants to reflect on conflicting frames, and engage in reflective governance.
