Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Adaptation to the impacts of climate change has gradually been recognised as a new policy objective and a new area of public policy across various geo-political scales. There are no clear demarcations of responsibilities yet, which is problematic because vagueness of roles and responsibilities is regularly cited as a barrier to the governance of adaptation. The lack of clarity about responsibilities is narrowly related to normative issues. Sharing of responsibilities among public and/or private actors for adaptation to climate induced risks could be desirable from a perspective of effectiveness and access to resources, but at the same time raise concerns about legitimacy and equity. We welcome empirical as well as theoretical contributions that address related issues, such as: •Normative frameworks for evaluating governance arrangements for adaptation; • A comparative analysis of public-private responsibilities for different adaptation themes (increased flood risks, heat stress, droughts etc.);• Evaluations of public-private governance arrangements;• The scope of private involvement and self-governance in adaptation to climate change.
| Title | Details |
|---|---|
| Constructing Legitimacy for Climate Change Planning: A Study of Local Government in Denmark | View Paper Details |
| Ways Towards Resilience. Governance of Climate Adaptation and Conceptions of the Public Interest | View Paper Details |
| Legitimate Adaptive Flood Risk Governance Beyond the Dikes: The Cases of Hamburg, Helsinki and Rotterdam | View Paper Details |
| Public Private Responsibilities in a Time of Crisis and Uncertainty: Law and Climate Change Adaptation | View Paper Details |
| Parametric Insurance Instruments as Historical and Social Product | View Paper Details |