Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
In person icon Building: Faculty of Law, Floor: Ground, Room: FL021
Saturday 14:00 - 15:40 CEST (10/09/2016)
What mechanism(s) lead an individual to choose to vote for a party or politician that he or she knows to be corrupt? Recent empirical research has shown that the presence of electoral choice is far from a panacea in curbing corruption, suggesting a breakdown in a key mechanism of democratic accountability. In this panel, we encourage scholars to propose manuscripts that study the effects of corruption on voting behavior via experimental or quasi-experimental research designs. Participants are welcome to conceive of the concept of corruption in a broad (societal) or narrow (individual scandals) manor to test these effects.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Democracy in the context of Clientelism: The Role of Electoral Laws in Bangladesh | View Paper Details |
Socio-economic dependence on the state and voting in Russia | View Paper Details |
What aspects of corruption increase the electoral punishment? Evidence from a conjoint experiment | View Paper Details |
Will Transparency Curb Corruption? Electoral Mobilization in Russia, Sweden and Italy | View Paper Details |