In person icon Conspiracism, Anti-Science and Anti-Intellectualism Among Citizens and its Impact on Democracy

Abstract

This panel will explore the rise of conspiracism, anti-science rhetoric, and anti-intellectualism in contemporary society. These interconnected themes have become influential tools in shaping public opinion, undermining established knowledge systems, and fueling political polarization. By investigating their origins, mechanisms, and impacts, the panel aims to provide a nuanced understanding of how these phenomena challenge the foundations of democratic societies and erode trust in expertise. Conspiracy theories, once fringe beliefs, have evolved into mainstream narratives, amplified by digital media and political actors. Their appeal lies in offering simplistic explanations for complex societal issues, often framing elites, minorities, or institutions as conspirators. This panel will explore how such narratives not only undermine trust in political and epistemic institutions but also foster division by creating in-group and out-group dynamics. The growing dismissal of scientific expertise and the rise of anti-science rhetoric are closely tied to this trend. These narratives challenge the credibility of scientific consensus on issues such as climate change and public health, portraying science as biased, politicized, or serving elite interests. This panel will examine how such rhetoric gains traction, particularly in online spaces where misinformation spreads rapidly. We will discuss how this erosion of trust in scientific expertise contributes to policy inaction on critical global challenges and fosters skepticism toward technological innovations and advancements. Anti-intellectualism, another key focus of the panel, reflects a broader societal shift in which critical thinking and intellectual engagement are devalued. This phenomenon often manifests in the rejection of higher education, disdain for expert opinions, and the promotion of populist rhetoric that prioritizes “common sense” over informed deliberation. Through surveys, experiments, and case studies, this panel will investigate the origins and impacts of these trends. It will explore their consequences for public discourse, political decision-making, and trust in institutions, while identifying strategies to rebuild faith in science, expertise, and democratic principles. How do these trends affect public trust in institutions? What role do socio-economic and cultural factors play in shaping susceptibility to these beliefs? And most importantly, how can societies counter these trends and restore trust in science, expertise, and democracy? This panel will contribute to a broader understanding of how conspiratorial and anti-scientific narratives operate within contemporary society and offer insights into mitigating their impact on democracy and public life.

Title	Details
Understanding Anti-Institutional Extremism: A Content Analysis of Dutch Telegram Channels	View Paper Details
When Do Citizens View Science as Politically Biased?	View Paper Details
The Evil Enemy: Belief in Conspiracy Theories Predicts Attitudes to War	View Paper Details
Understanding Anti-Science, Conspiracism, and Anti-Intellectualism in Belgium: A Survey-Based Analysis	View Paper Details
The Role of Socio-Economic Indicators in Explaining Conspiratorial and Anti-Science Beliefs.	View Paper Details