ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

In person icon Feminism, Democracy, Violence and Representation

Democracy
Democratisation
Gender
Political Psychology
Social Movements
Political Sociology
Feminism
Activism
P196
Laurel Weldon
Simon Fraser University
Lena Wängnerud
University of Gothenburg
Patrik Ohberg
University of Gothenburg

Abstract

This panel brings takes up themes of democracy, representation and violence, exploring the ways that mobilization in civil society, representation, and gender equality are related. The papers examine the relationship between gender violence and democracy, and look at the ways that feminist mobilization shapes gender regimes on violence and representation and vice versa. The panel also looks at activism inside the legislature, exploring how feminist identity shapes political action supporting women’s group interests. How do these relationships relate to challenges to democracy represented by the rise of right-wing, authoritarian and anti-gender political mobilization? Each of the papers speaks to more than one of these questions and themes. Abstract for Kriszan and Roggeband paper (couldn't update this below for some reason): subtitle: Violence and pathways to violence in the context of anti-gender politics Krizsan, A., Central European University and Roggeband, C., University of Amsterdam C.m.roggeband@uva.nl This paper aims to conceptualize and empirically demonstrate how anti-gender and anti-democratic politics create and reinforce gender based violent practices and pathways to gender violence. While we want to understand how in the context of anti-gender politics violent practices spread, we also delve into how the anti-gender context prominently contributes to the conditions that make violence occur, remain unpunished and be acceptable.  Conceptually we differentiate between violent practices and pathways to violence. We define violent practices in the context of anti-gender politics as the use of emotional, social, economic, physical, or sexual harm—whether in public or private spaces—with the aim of maintaining or reinforcing gendered power hierarchies, gender norms and establish an exclusionary political order. Next to violence in formal institutional settings, targeting political adversaries or competitors, we look at other spheres, where individuals and groups including civil society, media, academics, as well as ordinary people who challenge the misogynistic and homophobic agenda of anti-gender politics are targeted. We also identify various pathways to violence facilitated by anti-gender politics. Pathways to violence in the context of this paper refers to factors that facilitate and/or structure the path to violence. The two main pathways to violence that we identify are: anti-gender discourses that legitimate violence, and the decreasing responsiveness of policy regimes that regulate violence. Building on the comparative analysis of data from 6 EU countries we demonstrate how anti-gender politics contributes to increased levels of gender violence. We show how this will vary depending on the institutionalization of anti-gender politics and levels of democratic erosion.

Title Details
Boundaries of Belonging: Exploring EU Narratives on LGBTIQ+ Rights in Routine and Crisis Legitimization View Paper Details
Passion, Passiveness, and Gender: Analyzing the Narratives of Populist Right-Wing Party Members View Paper Details
Gender, Feminist Mobilization and Democratic Backsliding: Sketching a Global trajectory View Paper Details
The Politics of Feminist Group Awareness View Paper Details
Gender Based Violence and De-Democratization. View Paper Details