Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: Health Science Centre, Floor: Ground, Room: A005
Thursday 09:00 - 10:45 BST (15/08/2024)
The panel seeks to explore the democratic implications of private efforts to safeguard AI, quantum, and related technologies. On the one hand, many people think developers and operators bear significant responsibility for mitigating ethical risks and ensuring that models are ethically aligned. On the other hand, given the pervasive effects of emerging tech, those who control its features enjoy considerable power, which might sometimes clash with notions of (e.g.) self-determination, political equality, public accountability, or deliberation. How might certain technology governance practices threaten democratic norms? When can these concerns be undercut or outweighed? Which approaches are consistent with or promotive of democratic legitimacy? Among many potential topics, papers might explore the democratic credentials/implications of alignment approaches like RLHF, standard-setting bodies like IEEE and ISO, third-party auditing schemes, or stakeholder engagement approaches, as well as more fundamental theoretical questions about the relationship between democracy, business, and technology.
Title | Details |
---|---|
AI Governance and the Institutional Division of Labor | View Paper Details |
The Accountability Problem of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Transhumanist Theory of Democracy | View Paper Details |
Innovation and Domination: Finding the Balance | View Paper Details |