ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Social Groups and Electoral Politics: Group Appeals, Targeted Policy and Voter Responses

Parties and elections
Policy
TOU021
Isabelle Guinaudeau
Sciences Po Paris
Elisa Deiss-Helbig
Universität Konstanz

Building: C, Floor: 4, Room: MC405

Tuesday 14:00 - 17:00 CEST (25/04/2023)

Wednesday 09:00 - 17:00 CEST (26/04/2023)

Thursday 09:00 - 17:00 CEST (27/04/2023)

Friday 09:00 - 13:00 CEST (28/04/2023)

The growing multidimensionality of politics, fragmentation of society, and rising number of identities pose new challenges for the study of electoral politics (Dassonneville, 2022). In this context, the role of group politics is becoming increasingly important – both from the perspective of political actors (supply side) and voters (demand side). The classic literature on political competition and voting has already stressed the importance of group politics, mainly in terms of partisan and social-class identity, voting behaviour and electoral campaigns (Berelson et al., 1954; Campbell et al., 1960). However, societal processes have weakened ties between specific segments of society and specific parties, and the focus of research on electoral politics has therefore shifted towards issue- or candidate-based voting. In recent years, though, there has been a revival in the interest in social groups in electoral politics (Achen & Bartels, 2017; Huddy, 2018) indicating that parties tend to target more narrowly defined groups than in the past (Häusermann et al., 2013; Thau, 2019). Despite this renewed scholarly interest in group politics, we still know surprisingly little about the supply side of how parties try to address and mobilize social groups, nor about the evolution of the linkages between parties and groups, under consideration of the socially given variety of groups. These linkages need to be examined from both the perspective of appeals in electoral campaigns and the use of group-based heuristics by citizens to make sense of this supply (Kam & Kinder, 2012; Redlawsk & Lau, 2013). This Workshop examines the linkages between parties and social groups from the perspective of appeals in electoral programs, political speeches and social media, targeted public policy proposals and citizens’ responses to these group appeals. Thereby, it also links to normative debates about the idea that competition between parties (or candidates) representing different social groups, reflected in electoral programs and policies, will improve substantive representation (Dahl, 1971). With regard to the supply side, the Workshop will examine which groups of voters parties address, and claim to represent, over time. Among other topics, Papers will investigate whether traditional class alignments persist, whether parties and groups realign along new identity-based lines (Stuckelberger & Tresch, 2022), or whether parties seek to ‘catch all’ by addressing a wide range of groups (Horn et al., 2020; Somer-Topcu, 2015). With respect to the demand side, the Workshop will study which group-based heuristics voters perceive as relevant, how voters respond to group targeting in electoral campaigns, and also how some groups proactively demand beneficial policy commitments. The Workshop seeks in particular to bridge the lack of knowledge on the electoral returns of symbolic appeals and particularistic proposals (Elinder et al., 2015; Robison et al., 2021). Bringing together scholars in electoral studies, comparative politics, communication, political psychology and political behaviour, this Workshop will draw on theoretical and empirical innovation to understand the emergence and evolution of social groups and the role of group politics for party competition, voting and representation.

This Workshop targets a wide range of scholars working on party-voter alignments, campaigns, targeting, electoral behaviour and group politics. We welcome submissions from PhD candidates and early-career researchers, as well as established scholars in the field. Alongside the quality of proposals and their fit with the Workshop subject, Workshop Directors seek a balance in terms of gender, geographical origin and academic age. We invite Papers that are innovative, theoretically informed, and use cutting-edge qualitative and or quantitative methods, such as (semi-)automated text analysis of electoral programs, speeches or social media data, survey experiments or qualitative case studies, to analyze how parties appeal to groups and how groups express demands and react to the electoral supply. We particularly invite comparative perspectives, but also welcome qualitative case studies speaking to the broader debate. We are looking forward to contributions that tackle the question of group politics from the supply- and demand side, as well as those investigating the whole range of socially diverse groups and different kinds of group appeals. Questions addressed in Papers investigating the supply side might be:  To what extent do parties address groups explicitly or implicitly, with particularistic proposals or with rhetoric or more symbolic appeals?  How do parties combine policy issues and group appeals?  When and why do parties negatively address certain kinds of voters?  Does the rise of social media help transform practices of targeting? Are groups addressed differently, reflecting, for instance, their level of resources or perceived deservingness? Does this vary according to contextual factors such as the electoral system, polarization or campaign funding regulations? On the demand side, we welcome Papers that ask:  Do voters’ responses to group targeting vary depending on how (e.g., symbolically, negatively or positively) campaigns address their in-group or other groups? And what is the role of individual group identification?  How do voters react to incumbents’ past targeted policies (retrospective voting)? We are also interested, more broadly, in potential consequences on political attitudes, the feeling of being represented or the salience of identities. Eventually, the Workshop seeks to shed light on the interplay between the demand- and supply-side, considering how citizens react to parties and their supply, but also the other way around. Regarding the range of groups, we explicitly welcome contributions dealing with group appeals more broadly as well as with appeals to specific groups (e.g., women, the youth, the poor, rural population). We also invite Papers that focus on multiple, overlapping and potentially intersecting group identities and the impact of these group-based cross-pressures on voters’ responses. In addition, we are interested in different natures of group appeals (symbolic / particularistic, positive / negative…). We invite not only contributions looking at how voters respond to appeals benefitting them or groups they perceive as deserving, but also at voters’ reactions to negative (out-)group targeting. Finally, we are also looking forward to conceptual contributions from a theoretical and empirical perspective reflecting on how group appeals and targets can be defined and measured.

Title Details
Varieties of identity politics: A macro-historical approach View Paper Details
Group identities and their perceived representation in the party system: evidence from four European countries View Paper Details
Parties’ group appeals across space and time: an effort towards an automated, large-scale analysis of parties’ election manifestos. View Paper Details
What counts for citizens’ programmatic choices? A conjoint experiment on ideology, policy trade-offs and group representation View Paper Details
Policy meets identity: Why and how research on party competition needs to engage with group appeals View Paper Details
Algorithmic Microtargeting? Testing the Influence of the Meta Ad Delivery Algorithm View Paper Details
Voter Reactions to Trajectories of Women’s Representation: Experimental Evidence on the Group Politics of Gender View Paper Details
The personification of politics - Parties strategic choice between group and issue appeals View Paper Details
Who cares for younger generations? An analysis of young people’s parliamentary representation in France and Italy View Paper Details
Who are they talking about? Detecting mentions of social groups in political texts with supervised learning View Paper Details
Visual group appeals as a campaigning tool: a comparison of Facebook and television ads View Paper Details
Symbolic or substantial? German subnational parties' use of group appeals on Twitter View Paper Details
Exploring the connection between social group appeals and party policy positions View Paper Details
Political Targeting on Social Media: A Study of Tailored Messages and Ad Success in the German 2021 General Election View Paper Details
Do Citizens’ Perceptions of Parties’ Positions in a Multidimensional Space Shape Partisanship? View Paper Details
Unequal representation in redistributive politics: Evidence from interviews with politicians and citizens View Paper Details
Ethnic parties, and ethnic linkages? Pachakutik's mixed and segmented linkages. View Paper Details
You and Whose Economy? The Neglected Role of In-group Economic Perceptions View Paper Details
Does BERT find the 'families with children'? Comparing Methods of Identifying Group Appeals in Political Texts View Paper Details