ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

ECPR

Install the app

Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.

Just tap Share then “Add to Home Screen”

Frontiers of Science in Social Media Research: Computational and Experimental Methods to Study Digital Democracy

Parties and elections
Methodology
TOU007
Michael Bossetta
Lunds Universitet
Isabelle Borucki
Philipps-Universität Marburg

Building: D, Floor: 3, Room: MD301

Tuesday 13:00 - 17:45 CEST (25/04/2023)

Wednesday 09:00 - 17:00 CEST (26/04/2023)

Thursday 09:00 - 17:00 CEST (27/04/2023)

Friday 09:00 - 12:30 CEST (28/04/2023)

The electoral success of extremist politicians, the networked spread of disinformation, and an uptick in hate speech all relate to widespread social media use. Worryingly, the European political research community remains under equipped to study these phenomena, which challenge social cohesion and traditional models of state governance (Borucki & Schuenemann, 2019). Theoretically, scholars struggle to keep up with the rapidly changing social media landscape (Bossetta, 2018), and methodological difficulties in big data analysis limit researchers’ ability to produce robust and reproducible findings (Stieglitz et al., 2019). Compounding these challenges, social media platforms have recently imposed heavy restrictions on researchers’ access to data (Bruns, 2019; Walker et al., 2019; Freelon, 2018). Currently, three methodological approaches guide this growing field of research:  survey methods  computational methods  experimental methods. However, each approach has critical drawbacks that limit their contributions to science. While the primary method for studying social media is through surveys, research finds that citizens’ recall of self-reported behaviour does not align with their online activity (Vraga et al., 2016; Haenschen, 2019). Meanwhile, the computational analysis of digital data suffers from non-representative and incomplete datasets (Tromble, 2019), as well as the inconsistent application of research ethics (Shah et al., 2015; Tromble, 2021). Lastly, experimental designs that create ‘mock-ups’ of social media platforms fail to fully replicate these environments, because they cannot incorporate the personalized algorithms that these platforms offer (DeVito, 2016). Therefore, interdisciplinary and innovative solutions are needed to solve these methodological challenges and shed light on the digital aspects of modern democracy. Techniques borrowed from computer science, such as text mining, machine learning, and social network analysis open up new pathways for data collection and analysis. Inspiration can also be drawn from the behavioural sciences, where controlled experiments isolate how social media affects citizens’ cognitive processing and attitude formation. However, few scholarly arenas have focused on how computational methods and experiments can be combined to maximize the value of social media research and compensate for the limitations of each method. Knowing how to best synergize the findings from various methodological approaches will therefore aid scholars in their descriptive and prescriptive assessments of social media’s impact on democratic processes. This Workshop pushes forward an interdisciplinary methodological agenda to foster academic discussion at the intersection of political science, data science, and experimental methods. Paper proposals should involve either computational methods or experiments to address the overarching research questions: 1. How can the insights from computational social science inform experimental research, and vice versa? 2. What new methodologies, or innovative combination of existing methodologies, can be harnessed to maximize the findings of social media research in ways that promote our understanding of society, politics, and democracy?

We invite contributions from scholars that demonstrate a keen interest in digital politics (either through prior research or through the research aims of their abstract). We aim to build the Workshop around contributions from scholars representing a wide geographical spread of institutions, as well as across academic ranks, ethnicities, and between genders. Similarly, we aim to incorporate a diverse range of scientific perspectives. Any theoretical approach is welcome, insofar as an original theoretical argument is advocated. The abstract should propose research connected to digital democracy and offer a rigorous empirical approach involving computational methods or experiments. In terms of analytical scope, we invite papers that utilize computational methods or experiments to study one of four actor-types:  political  media  citizens  platforms This broad scope incorporates an empirical focus on topics such as:  political campaigning and legislation (parties, party leaders, and interest groups)  media information environments (journalism, alternative media, and disinformation)  civic engagement (online discussions, polarization, and social movements/protests)  platform studies (network formation, algorithm research, or discourses from platforms themselves) We also welcome review articles, meta-analyses, and methods-oriented Papers that diagnose or develop synergies between classic survey methods, computational methods, and experiment designs. Methodologically, the Workshop construes computational methods broadly and invites datatypes ranging across text, audio, visual, or metadata. The analytical techniques deployed may be fully automated or computer-assisted, such as the computational collection of data followed by manual coding. A wide range of experimental approaches are also welcome, ranging from small-N lab settings to larger survey-based experiments (online or offline) and natural field experiments or employing social network analysis as a relational method. In particular, we seek to include abstracts that tackle understudied digital spaces (i.e., non-Twitter mainstream platforms or fringe platforms), novel comparisons across established platforms, as well as under-represented empirical contexts in the literature (i.e., cases outside the Anglosphere). Papers should strive for innovative or mixed methods approaches, either by applying established methods in unconventional ways or attempting new methodologies altogether. We especially invite Papers that adhere to open science principles. That is, Papers conducting confirmatory research (i.e., that formulate hypotheses) should commit to pre-registering hypotheses before conducting analysis. Papers conducting exploratory research (i.e., that do not formulate hypotheses) should offer a justification for why they do not formulate expectations and commit to producing hypotheses as an outcome of their research. Please commit, when possible, to make your datasets publicly available and provide all necessary materials (e.g., code) to replicate your analysis and figures. Your Paper proposal should therefore indicate in the abstract whether your intended research design is exploratory or confirmatory.

Title Details
Predicting endorsement of leadership candidates in the September and October 2022 Conservative leadership elections using MP Twitter networks. View Paper Details
Explaining protest participation in semi-authoritarian regimes: The power of social networks View Paper Details
Leveraging Facebook targeted advertisments to study misinformation on social media View Paper Details
Crowdsourcing arguments from debates and its implications in machine learning View Paper Details
The evolution and persistence of echo chambers over time and across topics: German Covid-19 and Russo-Ukrainian War conversations on Twitter View Paper Details
A nine-language longitudinal analysis of migration-related content on three social media platforms, 2014-2019 View Paper Details
Repertoires of digital action and types of party on Facebook. The case of the 2022 French presidential election View Paper Details
What drives the spread? A Discrete Choice Experiment on the role of heuristic thinking in the proliferation of propaganda content on social media View Paper Details
DOPEH, Dynamics of online political elite hostility: A study of the multimodal anatomy of negative campaigning in political ads on meta. View Paper Details
Digital Deliberation: Computational Insights from Discussions in Online Resistance Communities View Paper Details
Heterogeneous voter preferences and fame avoidance behavior. Explaining strategic issue (non-)emphasis on migration policy in Germany 2015-2021 View Paper Details
Concept Sustainability for Social Media and Politics Research: Reconstructing the Concept of Affordances through Science Mapping View Paper Details
Are deleted Tweets a source of bias and what can we learn from studying phantom tweets? View Paper Details