Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Building: A - Faculty of Law, Floor: 4, Room: 405
Monday 13:30 - 15:15 CEST (04/09/2023)
With the decline of open climate denialism – is delay the new denial? We are witnessing a shift in the climate policy debate. Many actors opposed to ambitious climate policy no longer deny the seriousness of the issue, or the cause of it. Instead, they often advocate a delayed ‘just’ energy transition avoiding societal and economic change now, moving it rather to an unspecified future. Such strategies can include advocating a cautious approach dependent on future technological advances that avoid societal and economic change in the present. A broad consensus over pursuing a ‘Just Transition’ to ‘Net Zero’ hides significant contestation, including between those advocating ambitious climate strategy and those opposing it, either outright or through a strategy of delayed policy and delayed policy implementations. This panel welcomes contributions exploring practices of climate obstruction and delayism in different regions and sectors.
| Title | Details |
|---|---|
| Populist Right Wing Discursive Tactics in European Regional Decarbonization | View Paper Details |
| The varying levels of climate delayism in Central Asia: consequences for the region’s geopolitics of the energy transition | View Paper Details |
| To Deny or to Delay: Climate action delayism and its relationships with climate change anxiety and denialism | View Paper Details |
| "Climate obstruction efforts in the EU" | View Paper Details |
| Contesting just transitions: Climate delay and the contradictions of labour environmentalism | View Paper Details |