Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
Install this application on your home screen for quick and easy access when you’re on the go.
Just tap then “Add to Home Screen”
This panel tackles the issue of "sanctuary" from a conceptual/theoretical perspective, investigating in particular the relationship between sanctuary and the notions of “urban citizenship” (Bauböck and Orgad 2020), “acts of citizenship” (Isin and Nielsen 2008) and “lived citizenship” (Lister 2007, Kallio, Wood et al. 2020). Authors in this panel would be invited to draw on the experiences of sanctuary cities and civil-society-led sanctuary practices across both sides of the Atlantic in order to illuminate the relationship between sanctuary and citizenship at the conceptual level. The idea here is to assess the extent to which sanctuary can be said to inaugurate a form of citizenship that is independent of legal status and that is largely detached from national belonging: a form of “sanctuary city-zenship”.
Title | Details |
---|---|
Challenging political membership from below. Sanctuary cities and the politics of urban citizenship | View Paper Details |
Ordinary sanctuary: A concept in action at the French-Italian border | View Paper Details |
Sanctuaries, City-zenship, and Republican Theory before and after the Nation State | View Paper Details |